Contact

6 Platforms That Help Construction Firms Improve Cost Management 

Businesses rarely reach a clean moment when they realise their accounting software is no longer fit for purpose. The recognition tends to build gradually: month-end closes that drag on well past acceptable timelines, financial reports that can only be produced by stitching together spreadsheets manually, no practical way to view performance across multiple entities or cost centres without considerable effort, and a finance team that has become expert at routing around the system rather than relying on it.

By the time the conclusion is unavoidable, the true cost of staying — measured in finance team hours absorbed, decisions made without current information, and the ongoing risk of acting on inaccurate data — has typically already exceeded the cost of moving to a better platform. The question shifts from whether to upgrade to which platform deserves the investment. The following six are worth serious evaluation.

1. Sage Intacct: Cloud-Based Financial Management

Sage Intacct is built specifically for the financial complexity that mid-market and growing businesses encounter once entry-level accounting tools can no longer keep pace. Multi-entity consolidation, dimensional reporting that spans departments and projects at the same time, advanced revenue recognition, and real-time dashboards reflecting live transaction data are core features rather than add-ons requiring months of configuration to enable.

Where generic platforms often demand significant customisation before they can approximate these capabilities, Sage Intacct delivers them out of the box. Its open API is designed with third-party integration in mind, positioning the platform as the financial hub at the centre of a connected technology stack rather than a closed system demanding that other tools be replaced. A network of certified, sector-specific implementation partners supports deployment, and most businesses report meaningful reductions in month-end close times within the first few cycles after go-live.

Why it matters: Sage Intacct addresses the structural complexity that businesses experience when they have outgrown their current platform — it is purpose-built for that situation rather than stretched to accommodate it.

2. Rippling: Workforce and People Management Platform

In most growing businesses, people costs represent the single largest line item in the budget, which means the quality of workforce cost data feeding into financial reporting directly shapes the accuracy of every margin calculation and budget model that depends on it. Rippling brings HR, payroll, benefits, and spend management together in one platform and integrates with financial systems to surface real-time workforce cost data alongside operational headcount information.

When new starters, compensation adjustments, and departures flow directly into the financial system automatically, the finance function maintains a current view of the business's most significant cost driver at all times, rather than working from figures that are already a pay period out of date by the time they arrive.

Why it matters: Accurate, real-time workforce cost visibility is a prerequisite for sound budgeting and margin management in any organisation where people account for a substantial portion of total expenditure.

3. Boomi: Enterprise Integration Platform

Businesses operating more complex technology environments — or where the data flows between systems involve too many variables for a lighter-weight automation tool — will find that Boomi provides an enterprise-grade integration layer capable of connecting virtually any combination of platforms through a managed, monitored infrastructure.

Boomi is particularly well suited to periods of technology transition, when an accounting platform upgrade needs to maintain data integrity across every connected system throughout the migration and into steady state. Its managed integration approach means that when individual platforms update, the connections between them are actively monitored and maintained, preventing the silent failures and data gaps that can otherwise go undetected for damaging lengths of time.

Why it matters: During a technology upgrade, the reliability of integration between systems carries as much weight as the capabilities of the individual platforms. Boomi ensures that data moves correctly throughout the transition and on an ongoing basis thereafter.

4. Pigment: Financial Planning and Analysis Platform

Upgrading to a more capable accounting platform delivers the accurate, real-time financial data that sound decision-making depends on. Translating that data into meaningful planning and forecasting, however, requires a dedicated FP&A platform that goes further than accounting software is designed to reach.

Pigment connects directly to live financial data, enabling finance teams to construct dynamic planning models, run scenario analyses across a range of assumptions, and maintain rolling forecasts that refresh as actuals are posted rather than becoming dated the moment they are finalised. For organisations where planning has relied on building and rebuilding spreadsheet-based models, Pigment represents a structurally more reliable and more efficient approach to financial forecasting.

Why it matters: Real-time financial data delivers its greatest value when it feeds into planning models that reflect current conditions. Pigment provides the FP&A capability that converts better data into better decisions.

5. Workato: Integration and Automation Platform

One of the most recognisable symptoms of an outgrown accounting system is the volume of manual steps required to move data between the finance function and the rest of the business. Sales figures from the CRM, payroll data from HR, project costs from operational tools — all of it requires human handling to reach the accounts, creating a process that is slow, prone to error, and ultimately avoidable.

Workato is an enterprise integration and automation platform that connects business systems and automates data flows between them without requiring bespoke development work. Once the accounting platform has been upgraded to one with a properly designed API, Workato manages the orchestration across all connected systems, allowing data to move automatically and freeing the finance team from routine manual transfer tasks.

Why it matters: Integration is what transforms a set of separate platforms into a coherent, connected business system. Workato provides that connective layer without the need for an in-house development capability.

6. Vanta: Compliance and Security Automation Platform

As businesses grow and begin entering new markets, pursuing enterprise clients, or seeking institutional investment, compliance obligations that were easy to defer at an earlier stage become commercially significant. Data protection requirements, information security standards, and audit readiness expectations that once seemed abstract take on real weight when they start influencing whether deals close.

Vanta is a compliance automation platform that supports businesses in implementing and continuously monitoring the security controls and policies needed to meet recognised standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, and Cyber Essentials. It integrates with the financial and operational systems a growing business already uses and generates the audit-ready evidence that enterprise clients and institutional investors increasingly expect before committing to material commercial relationships.

Why it matters: Compliance requirements that are easy to sideline at an early stage become barriers to growth at a later one. Vanta addresses them systematically rather than leaving the business to react under pressure.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can we tell whether we have genuinely outgrown our accounting software or simply need to use it more effectively?
The most reliable indicators are structural in nature rather than operational. If month-end close consistently runs beyond five to seven working days, if producing consolidated reports across entities or departments requires manual spreadsheet assembly, if dimensional reporting demands workarounds that the system was not designed for, or if the finance team has developed habits built around avoiding the system's limitations rather than working within a capable one — these are platform constraints, not process failures. Better processes can extract additional value from software that is broadly adequate, but they cannot overcome the structural ceiling of a platform that was never built for the current level of complexity.

How much disruption should we expect when migrating to a new accounting platform?
A well-managed migration is typically far less disruptive than anticipated, and the long-term benefits substantially outweigh the short-term effort. The most significant risk factors are manageable: selecting an implementation partner with genuine sector-specific experience, establishing a clear data migration strategy before any work begins, and choosing a go-live date that avoids the most demanding periods in the finance calendar all reduce disruption considerably. Most businesses that handle the transition carefully report that their main reflection afterwards is having waited longer than necessary before making the move.

Will we be able to retain our existing CRM, HR, and operational systems when we upgrade the accounting platform?
Yes. Sage Intacct is designed specifically to sit at the centre of a best-of-breed technology stack rather than to displace the systems around it. Its open API supports connections to leading CRM, HR, payroll, and operational platforms, which means upgrading the financial core enhances the value of the surrounding systems by giving them a more capable hub to connect to, rather than requiring their replacement.

What does a realistic implementation timeline look like from the decision to go live?
Timelines differ based on organisational complexity, but most mid-market businesses complete the move to Sage Intacct within three to five months when working alongside an experienced implementation partner. Organisations with multiple entities, more involved revenue recognition requirements, or a large number of system integrations to rebuild should anticipate the process taking longer. Beginning the evaluation early and committing adequate internal resource to the project are the most dependable ways to keep timelines from extending unexpectedly.

How should we approach building the business case for board or ownership approval?
The most effective board-level cases start by quantifying what the current system is already costing: in finance team time consumed by workarounds, in the risk carried by decisions made on data that is incomplete or delayed, and in the practical constraints the platform places on the organisation's ability to grow. Framing those costs in financial terms, and setting them against a grounded assessment of the investment required and the expected return in operational efficiency and decision quality, gives the board a basis for evaluating the proposal on commercial grounds rather than treating it as an elective or discretionary expenditure.